Monday, January 27, 2014

From Hoxha to Bainimarama

I am old enough to remember the Communist Party of New Zealand claiming that in the socialist paradise of Albania every single person, bar a handful of Trotskyists and CIA agents, not only supported but loved supreme leader Enver Hoxha. Back in the late '80s the Communist Party’s paper The People’s Voice liked to juxtapose photographs of picket lines outside timber yards in Tokoroa with portraits of Hoxha’s rock-like face and excited accounts of life in his Balkan nation, where crime, unemployment, and other social ills were allegedly unknown.

Years after the disintegration of the Hoxhaite regime, I chatted with a Kiwi who had travelled to the socialist paradise of Albania and lauded it in print, and asked him how he could have drawn such mistaken conclusions about the place. He explained that he had talked with scores of Albanians, and that they had all praised the regime that ruled them. What he hadn’t realised, of course, is that his interlocutors had no option but to echo the party line, if they wanted to keep their jobs and their liberty.

I thought about the deluded supporters of Enver Hoxha when I read a recent guest post at Kiwiblog, the popular website of National Party insider David Farrar. Under the title ‘A first hand but different view of Fiji’, Farrar reproduced the opinions of Deane Jessup, an ‘enterprise communications specialist’ who recently took a holiday in Fiji.

After two weeks of ‘deep honest conversations’ with Fijians ‘from all walks of life’, including an elderly man who gave him a class in weaving and a taxi driver or two, Jessup has concluded that the regime of Frank Bainimarama, which has been condemned by all of Fiji’s political parties for censoring, detaining, and sometimes torturing its opponents, is a ‘revolutionary’ force for good, and should be supported by all New Zealanders.

Fiji’s trade union movement and its Labour Party have complained about declining social services and standards of living under Bainimarama’s dictatorship, but Jessup insists that ‘health and hospitals are ten times better’ than they were before Bainimarama, and that the education system has been similarly transformed. Roads and bridges are being built ‘everywhere’, and the economy is ‘bustling’.

Jessup claims that every Fijian he talked with, without exception, supported Bainimarama. He concedes that Bainimarama has some high-profile critics, like the leaders of the Labour Party and the Methodist church, but contends that these dissidents are ‘racist’, ‘corrupt’, and ‘nepotistic’, and shouldn’t be taken seriously as representatives of Fijian opinion. Both Fijian political parties and human rights watchdogs have condemned the constitution Bainimarama recently forced on Fiji, warning that its curbs on freedom of assembly and expression mean that the election scheduled for later this year cannot be genuinely democratic. Jessup, though, knows better. He predicts that the election will be free and fair, and that ‘everyone’ in Fiji will vote for Bainimarama. Not even Enver Hoxha was quite as popular as Bainimarama seems to be.

Jessup isn’t so tasteless as to discuss explicitly the detention without trial and torture of Bainimarama’s enemies and the censoring of his critics in the media and the academy. He accepts that unspecified ‘bad things’ happen in Fiji, but notes that these mysterious ‘bad things’ also happen elsewhere too, and thus shouldn’t be a cause for concern.

Deane Jessup’s love letter to Bainimarama contrasts interestingly with the impressions of Fiji that Dr Maikolo Horowitz of the ‘Atenisi Institute offered on this blog last year. After visiting Fiji on behalf of an American radio news network and holding extensive discussions with human rights activists, lawyers, journalists, and politicians, including Mahendra Chaudhry, the leader of the Labour Party, Horowitz concluded that Bainimarama had constructed an efficient and frightening dictatorship, and that he was not likely to surrender power anytime soon. Horowitz witnessed a peaceful demonstration against Bainimarama’s constitution being broken up with tear gas and long batons; he heard stories of Labour activists being beating beaten and jailed; he experienced the ferocious opposition of the Methodist church to Bainimarama; and he noted that Bainimarama’s constitution makes free and fair elections impossible.

Deane Jessup’s sheer lack of guile suggests to me that he isn’t writing propaganda for Fiji’s dictator out of some sort of vested interest. He probably did talk to a few Fijians during his recent holiday in the sun, and probably did find them all singing the praises of Bainimarama. But that sort of political unanimity ought to have troubled rather than excited Jessup.  

In his interview with me, Maikolo Horowitz noted that many of the Fijian journalists and civil servants who helped him acquire information and make contacts were very worried about their security, and insisted on meeting him privately. Suva was, Horowitz reported, a tense, troubled city, whose people were continually looking over their shoulders. When they encounter visitors to their country who lack Horowitz’s credentials and discretion, dissident Fijians would surely be very likely to keep their real opinion of Bainimarama secret. Like the Kiwi communist who visited the Albania of Enver Hoxha, Deane Jessup has failed to take into account the chilling effect that dictatorship has on free speech.

Footnote: A Lesson from Tonga

Deane Jessup’s clumsy apology for dictatorship in Fiji is not, in itself, remarkable – clumsy apologies for all sorts of unpleasant things are easy to find on the internet. The decision of a highly visible supporter of the National Party and an intimate of John Key to publish Jessup, though, deserves to be pondered.

It is possible that David Farrar’s decision to give Jessup space on his blog is simply a reflection of the lack of seriousness with which so many New Zeaanders regard the tropical Pacific. Instead of drawing on some of the rich body of informed research produced by Pacific experts like Maikolo Horowitz to help him think about Fiji, Farrar may have lazily turned to a mate who spent a week or so on a beach recently and talked to a few taxi drivers. 

It is worth noting, though, that Cameron Slater, another high-profile blogger with close connections to the National Party, has also been publishing apologies for Bainimarama’s regime lately.  

Slater’s posts reflect a current of opinion on the Australasian right.  For almost a decade now, Australian and New Zealand governments have opposed Bainimarama, sought to exclude him from regional fora, and imposed a series of sanctions on Fiji. There are some on the right who believe that such a stance has become counterproductive. They point out that Fiji has responded to sanctions by strengthening relations with China, and worry that Australian and New Zealand business will be squeezed out of the Fijian archipelago by Chinese firms. For these advocates of a change of policy toward Fiji, the constitution written by Bainimarama and the election he has scheduled for this year offer excuses for the normalisation of diplomatic and economic ties.

But the recent history of Tonga should be a warning about the consequences of supporting the sort of undemocratic constitution Bainimarama has foisted on Fiji.  

In 2005 and 2006 the Tongan people revolted against their monarchy and nobility with strikes, mass marches, and a riot that destroyed much of downtown Nuku’alofa and prompted the deployment of Australian and New Zealand troops and police in the capital.
Realising that it had to offer some concessions to its opponents, the Tongan elite negotiated a constitution that, like Bainimarama’s document, blended apparently democratic with blatantly anti-democratic clauses. The constitution allowed for the election of a majority of seats in parliament by popular vote – but it reserved a third of seats for nobles. Eager to hold onto its influence with the Tongan elite and convinced that stability was better than ‘pure’ democracy, the New Zealand government ignored the flaws in the constitution.  

When Tonga held elections in 2010, New Zealand proclaimed that the country had made a transition from authoritarianism to democracy. The aftermath of the election showed up the fatuity of this boast. Seventy per cent of Tongans voted for the Democratic Party, but the constitution’s gerrymandering meant that nobles were able to form a government.  

The nobles’ illegitimate government has been a disaster for both the Tongan people, who have had to put up with more of the corruption and incompetence they voted so heavily against, and for New Zealand’s government, which has watched the nobles steer closer and closer to China and evict a Kiwi company from their air space.  

As Tonga looks forward to a new general election, the New Zealand government and its Canberra ally have belatedly and cynically sided with the country’s Democratic Party. But it is far from clear how the opposition can gain power in this year’s vote, given the gerrymandering built into the constitution. If the democrats again win a huge majority of the vote and again are denied government, then a return to the violent unrest of 2006 is hardly unlikely. Some supporters of the Democratic Party talk openly of civil war.  

The constitution Bainimarama has given to Fiji provides for multi-party elections, in an apparent concession to democracy – but it also makes it very difficult for parties to register themselves and limits their opportunities to demonstrate and propagandise. As the recent history of Tonga shows, people who are blocked from exercising their democratic rights will find other ways to express themselves. Bainimarama’s constitution guarantees a violent future for Fiji.

 [Posted by Scott Hamilton]



Anonymous Hoxhaism today said...

Hoxhaism lives!

10:11 pm  
Anonymous Simon said...

Good post mostly, but I'm not sure why the outrageous attack on socialist Albania and Comrade Hoxha is necessary.

10:15 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Under the draft constitution, the authorities can also limit freedom of speech when speech could impose “restrictions on the holders of public office.” This loophole would allow authorities to limit basic rights and freedoms for anyone they find to be critical of the government and authorities.

10:36 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cam Slater is a sick fuck who wrote a post masturbating over Bainimarama's cops' torture of prisoners. Cam thought it was great they shoved rods up the arses of the prisoners.

4:32 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

March 10th, 2013 at 10:04 pm
Cameron Slater’s views on Bainimarama are pretty vile (just like the Commodore).
Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote

4:34 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


Fiji's military dictator Voreqe Bainimarama has ordered two regime inquiries after he failed to win a television text message competition for personality of the year.

The regime's attorney general Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum told a press conference in Suva that the poll result has been changed and Bainimarama is first - beating out a woman who won it on January 1, Premila Kumar of the Fiji Consumer Council.

Bainimarama, who ended democracy with an armed coup in 2006 and refuses to restore democracy until 2014 at the earliest, claims the text polling run by semi-privately owned Fiji TV and Vodafone, was undemocratic.

"The allegation is that members of the public could text in and give their vote and the announcement was going to be made on the first of January," Sayed-Khaiyum says.

But they closed the poll on December 30 and ignored 1500 votes sent in on December 31 - and almost all of the votes on the last day were for Bainimarama. The uncounted votes appear to make up almost all of the submitted text votes.

Sayed-Khaiyum says Fiji TV has apologised and on January 9 reversed the result awarding the title to Bainimarama.

But the regime has sent a formal complaint to the Commerce Commission and to the Media Development Authority "in respect of unethical practices".

The authority was established by military decree and has dacronian powers to close down media outlets or force them to change owners - as they did to the Rupert Murdoch owned Fiji Times.

Under the revised Personality of the Year results, Bainimarama apparently scored 1700 votes to Kumar's 464.

4:35 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


9:20 am  
Blogger Sappa Tamang said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

10:19 pm  
Blogger Unknown said...

100% Safe to visit Nepal after the Earthquake Annapurna Base Camp story I was this trek on starting June 01th and Back Kathmandu 14th June 2015

Nepal is safe for traveling! According to the information from various sources such as Trekking Agencies Association (TAAN) and Nepal Tourism Board, Everest Base Camp and Annapurna Base Camp, Annapurna Circuit , Upper Mustang ,Dolpa, , Kanchenjunga Trek ,Ghorepani Poon hill, Jomsom Trek and Rara are safe for trekking, Pokhara tour, Chitwan safari tour, and Lumbini tour . Therefore, I personally went up to the Annapurna Base Camp on the first week of June. The purpose is to access the condition of the trek as to ensure the safety of the clients in the upcoming autumn season trek from September to November. The condition of the mountain is safe. All the lodges still good. The mountains still look beautiful as before. Do not hesitate to put Nepal as your travel wish list in next season. The beautiful country awaits you to visit. You support will help the country to rebuilt.

8:34 pm  
Blogger Sappa Tamang said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

2:14 am  
Blogger Harihar Adhikari said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

1:45 am  
Blogger Rashu Gurung said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

9:45 pm  
Blogger Unknown said...

Mount Face Nepal was established with aim of providing quality service and we are licensed trekking company of Nepal. As our team has experience and pragmatism staffs, we have been able to provide best quality service to our customers. We offer safe, unique and new routes which is more preferable by our customers. Meticulous planning goes into every aspect of your journey with Mount Face Nepal. The superior way that you will travel, the special places that you will visit, the remarkable people you will meet, the unexpected, unique experience along the way, you will see this different in everything we do. Not content with the mundane or second best, best seek out the ultimate. Great travel is seamless and should provide no distractions from experiencing the best of mountain culture, natural beauty, history and people.

Mount Face Nepal is new benchmark in travel. Why not experience it for yourself???
For more information;,

7:23 pm  
Blogger Trekking and Hiking In Nepal said...


Trekking in Nepal is the popular and most chosen travel activity by the tourist who come to travel in Nepal. The trekking generally denotes a walking adventure to various places of Nepal supported by various means of transportation along with guides and travel operators. The Nepal is geographically a difficult country with full of hills and mountains where there is lack of road so there are many walking trails which are now called trekking trails are created that passes through hills, forests, villages, mountains, river banks etc. Nepal is one of the best location of Asia for trekking with eight of the highest summit along with beautiful landscapes and high hills for open wide angle view of encompassing region. One could spend a year trekking in Nepal visiting all beautiful regions, traditional cities and villages, fascinating mountain region with beautiful natural setting, memorable Himalayan region along with antique and naturally blessed cities like Bhaktapur, Kathmandu, Lalitpur, Pokhara, Palpa, Chitwan, Bardiya, Langtang region, Annapurna region, Everest region, Helambu etc

- See more at:
Nepal planet Treks and Expedition

10:56 pm  
Blogger Unknown said...

Nepal is on the bucket list for most adventurers, View Nepal Treks and Expedition

Everest Gokyo Lake trekking

Everest Base Camp Trek

Annapurna Base Camp Trek

Ghorepani Poon Hill Trek

Upper Mustang Trek

Langtang Valley Trekking

Nepal Package Tour

Everest Helicopter Tour

11:17 pm  
Anonymous Everest Base Camp helicopter Tour said...

Your article is very nice....
We at Everest Base Camp helicopter Tour (P) Ltd from kathmandu nepal a very popular local tours and trekking company in Nepal. We are provide helicopter tour service to our customers at very affordable price. We are very happy to reading your article. Thanks for sharing..

Everest Base Camp Helicopter tour
Annapurna Base Camp Helicopter Tour
Everest Trek
Everest Base Camp Trek
Manaslu trek

3:27 pm  
Anonymous Himalayan Adventure Treks & Tours said...

Himalayan Adventure Treks & Tours invites you to the amazing world of fun, travel, and adventure! Himalayan Adventure Treks & Tours is one of the pioneers of tourism facilitators in Nepal. As such, we have built a foundation of experience and knowledge in this sector. Till this day, we have succeeded to organize and lead incredible tours, treks, peak climbing and mountaineering expeditions for both individual and group travellers in Nepal, Tibet, and Bhutan.

Our bond with our clients is based on trust and understanding. We have an amazing team who with their outstanding skills try their best to make your trip the best one of your life. Moreover, we are environmentally and socially committed to remote areas where we currently offer trips and tours supporting innovative sustainable development, preserving cultural heritage, and protecting nature through travel and tourism.
Himalayan Adventure Treks & Tours has the determination to succeed in not just organizing tours and treks but provide an opportunity for you to create unforgettable memories with nature, friends and family.

7:23 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home